Fr. Pimen
Simon’s Address to the IVth All-Diaspora Sobor
My reason for requesting the
opportunity to address this conference is because I have constantly noted the
ironic parallel between the attempt to accomplish reconciliation between ROCOR
and the MP and the attempts to reconcile Old Believers to, how shall I say, “Niconians”. Every argument I have heard sounds the same as
the diatribes between Old Believers and New Ritualists
that have gone on now for several centuries. First of all, the charges —
depending on what side you find yourself:
Old Believers “New Ritualists”
1. You are heretics. 1. You are schismatics.
2. You want to absorb and destroy us. 2.
You look for excuses to remain apart.
3. The patriarch has no right to claim 3.
Apostolic succession is intact and
legitimacy
personal sin does not destroy Apostolic succession.
4. We have retained purity and truth. 4.
You have become pharisaical in your exalted opinion of yourselves.
I could go on, but I’m sure that you
get the point. As an Old Believer “nastavnik”
struggling to educate my flock as to the legitimacy of the Russian Orthodox
Church, I came to realize that one of the most formidable tasks I faced was
speaking to the vituperative and extreme language used to justify the Old
Believer position. Old Believer polemicists had labeled the “Niconians” as heretics, betrayers of the Faith, persecutors
and even as ministers of the Antichrist—if Nicon was
not the Antichrist himself. Constantly the question arose: would joining the
ROC be a betrayal of our forefathers who died voluntarily or involuntarily for
the preservation of the “True Faith”? And if we are honest, it must be admitted
that many of the reforms of Patriarch Nicon and the
later westernized practices of the ROC were unnecessary and ill advised. Thus,
Old Believers had some justification in feeling reticent to recognize the
legitimacy of the ROC. And to this day no Old Believer can
join himself to the
ROC unless he can conclude that Stoglav, an all-Russian
Council, had exceeded its authority in certain areas.
And so here we are again. Did
Metropolitan Sergius lead the Church in
Vladika
Daniel told me over 20 years ago that the problem with most Old Believers is
that each step the ROC took to answer the Old Believers’ justification for not
uniting would be met with another requirement demanded before any union could
occur. And now? We make requests (or demands).
Collaboration between state and church must end. The MP 2000 Sobor seems to answer. New Martyrs and Royal Martyrs must
be glorified. Repentance must be sought. But the reality is that no matter what
is done, the faithful who grew up listening to all of
the insults hurled at the MP are never going to be satisfied—even as most Old
Believers won’t end their division with the New Ritualists—no
matter what steps are taken.
And finally, as I wrote in my open
letter, please admit that the collaboration and submission of the Church to
Peter I’s order to forbid the election of a Patriarch
and to place a state procurator over the Synod of bishops is not far removed
from the submission of the 20th century. Or consider the Church’s submission
and collaboration with “Orthodox” Catherine the Great. Do you really believe
the claims that this is all so different because the Church was united and
servile to “Orthodox” rulers rather than to avowed atheists? Of course there is
a difference, but as an Old Believer who has no connection with the need to
claim the legitimacy of 18th and 19th century collaboration with the state,
while calling the collaboration of the 20th century unmitigated sin, I must
personally stand before you and ask forgiveness as I suggest that there is a
significant degree of hypocrisy in such a claim.
My good friend and the translator for
most of our Old Rite publications, Fr. Herman Ciuba,
has stated to me on a number of occasions that there are so many critical
issues facing the Church and the faithful today, that to constantly argue over
what Metropolitan Sergius did in 1927 ought to be put in the past, even as the
persecutions against the Old Believers must be put into the past for God’s
judgment. I agree. In the 1970s after you courageously lifted the anathemas
against the Old Rite and against Old Believers, I came into contact with then Hieromonk Hilarion, Hieromonk Ioanniki and Fr.
Theodore Jurewicz. They showed me love and Orthodoxy.
I stopped worrying about who did what to whom in the 17th century. They loved;
I had to forgive, and they forgave me. Of course, I had to investigate
carefully whether there was heresy in the ROC. And you had to decide if the Old
Believers had become heretics. I found none; you could find none.
Do we really believe that millions of
Orthodox Christians in
When we came to priesthood, we had
dissenters. Some left us. Some have condemned me in public places. Some have
spat at my wife in public places. Some claimed that I had been given a gift of
a red Cadillac as payment for my betrayal of the pure Old Believer faith. And
if you make peace with the faithful under the authority of the Moscow
Patriarchate, there will be dissent, rumors and even some division, I fear. But
if this is what is right, then at some time we must have the courage to do what
is right. If it is the will of God, we will be safe and saved. I have
experienced the pain and suffering of division. I encourage those who would
cause raskol to trust that the grace of the Holy
Spirit will guide our bishops to rightly divide the word of truth. And, as I
indicated in my open letter after Vladika Daniel’s
interviews, my parish and I will remain faithful to the bishops of ROCOR to
whom we united ourselves in 1983.