A Post by Fr. Alexander
Lebedeff on the continuing fragmentation of the ROCiE Schismaticts
Apr
22, 2002
All
the documents of the Voronezh Meeting of ROCA(V) have now been published on
Peter Budzilovich's web site, along with several other key documents.
See
http://www.russia-talk.com/otkliki/otkliki.htm
There
you will find a personal directive from Archbishop Varnava to Peter Budzilovich
to post Archbishop Varnava's reaction (FRAUD--DISGRACE) to the Voronezh
Meeting's Resolutions and that meeting's Epistle to him directly, where he
(abp. Varnava) is accused of numerous canonical infractions and, in fact,
calling his actions "a knife in the back of his brothers."
There
you will also find a copy of two messages that were apparently sent by
Metropolitan Vitaly to Archbishop Lazarus and Bishop Benjamin, dated March 11,
2002, in which Metropolitan Vitaly blesses them to perform new hierarchical
consecrations and to establish a separate and independent
Synod
in Russia.
There
you will also find a copy of a letter from ROCiE Bishop Vladimir dated April
19, 2002 to Mr. Budzilovich, in which Bishop Vladimir states that he heard
about the above-mentioned Letters of Metropolitan Vitaly to Archbishop Lazarus
and Bishop Benjamin for the first time when he saw the
letter
published on Mr Budzilovich's site, and states that it appears to him that
these letters are a forgery and a provocation, "because the question of
the administrative situation in Russia falls within the competency only of a
Hierarchical Sobor (and not of a single bishop, even in the rank of a
Metropolitan)."
So,
it is clear that either Metropolitan Vitaly is acting like a "loose cannon"
and making critical administrative decisions without consulting his other
bishops, or someone else, taking advantage of the Metropolitan's diminished
capacity is doing it for him and having him sign these documents, or -- two of
the bishops of your Church, who have pledged unfailing loyalty to Metropolitan
Vitaly, have engaged in a fraudulent activity, forging Metropolitan Vitaly's
name on key documents affecting the
administration
of the Church in Russia.
In
any case, according to the letters of Archbishop Varnava and Bishop Vladimir,
they themselves have been held in the dark and out of the loop--which also
speaks volumes about the dynamics of the administration of the ROCA(V).
Also,
it should be noted that the Voronezh Meeting documents attack the ROAC (calling
them Suzdalite schismatics) and especially the ideology and practice of most
Greek Old Calendarists, specifically the Matthewites and the Chrysostomites
(but not the Cyprianites).
Paragraph
2.6 of the Official Closing Statement of the Conference in Voronezh (signed by
42 clergymen) states:
"We
may not accept the ideology and practice of certain Greek Old Calendarists (e.g.,
"Matthewites"
and "Chrysostomites") and Russian schismatics analogous to them
(uncanonical catacomb structures), who, in order to conceal their passions, use
the schismatic theories and methods of Novatian and Donatus relative to
"pure churches." That narrowly radical ideology reduces the ranks of
those opposing ecumenism and a new world order, at the same time increasing the
number of uncanonical societies of the sectarian sort, and drags its adherents
to the abyss of destruction."
The
Voronezh Meeting openly upheld the defenders of the Cyprianites, while attacking
other Greek schismatic groups as "unsuccessfully attempting to cover up
their moral falsehood and canonical infractions with radical demagoguery and
ultra-right-wing ecclesiology" and calls their path one of
"behind
the scenes intrigue and calumny, which creates within the Church a morally
corrupt atmosphere." In its Letter to Archbishop Varnava, the Convocation
of Clergy writes: "In your own diocese, we see that people in your
entourage, for the sake of secret dialogue with the schismatic Greek Synods of
Chrysostomos and Kallinikos, have invented a fight with the "heresy of Cyprianism,"
using it as an excuse to undermine the worthy clergy from Lyons."
The
Voronezh Meeting also attacked the entourage of Metropolitan Vitaly directly, writing:
[The
situation of Metropolitan Vitaly] "becomes even more complicated because
of the fact that among those persons who are closest to the First Hierarch,
reign dissensions, competition, and a struggle by groups for influence and
inheritance."
All
is not sailing on smoothly in the ROCiE, it seems.
With
love in Christ,
Prot.
Alexander Lebedeff